Is there a bone of Honesty and Human Compassion in this Twisted-Minded Obama?

In the light of Obama's myriad of sweet-sounding announcements to the public, I thought that maybe, by reminding people what kind of a deceitful person Obama is, Americans will think twice before they applaud him again.

The material may not be new, but their RELEVANCE has become even more PRONOUNCED and SIGNIFICANT today. So please WATCH AND LISTEN intently.


This was one of the ads that ran during the 2008 Presidential election campaign, in areas where the large majority of voters were PRO LIFE.

In the light of Obama's 100% PRO ABORTION voting record, need I say more?




Now, listen carefully for the deceptions in this video.

Some of Obama's deceptive talk

1) When asked on the topic, Obama said that knowing with specificity as to when a baby gets human rights is "above his paygrade." Meaning, it's beyond his competence and knowledge.

If he was truthful with his answer, that he does not know, then why has he been taking a strong PRO ABORTION stance? Why did he vote against the "Born Alive Infant Protection Act" at the State level? This Act would have protected all aborted babies who survived the attempted abortions. The Act would have entitled the surviving babies all the medical care. It's been found that anywhere from 10 to 20% of babies survive abortion attempts.

Obama's voting against the said legislation was a PURELY VICIOUS, SAVAGE, AND BARBARIC ACT OF INFANTICIDE.


2) When Obama was questioned about his (barbaric) vote, he had the AUDACITY (isn't that the title of his book?) to say that people were lying about his actual stand. He claimed that he completely supports providing "assistance to any infant born, even as a consequence of an abortion." He said that State bill he voted on was entirely a different bill. WHAT A SHAMELESS LIE, IN VIEW OF WHAT'S ON RECORD.

What was really the difference between the State version and the Federal version? ABSOLUTELY NONE.

As a sign of the discomfort he must have felt in answering the question, "when does a baby get human rights", the eloquent Obama went, "but" "but" "but" "but". Can you count how many "buts" he said?

I strongly recommend you also watch this video and the OTHER videos.

IS THERE A BONE OF HONESTY AND HUMAN COMPASSION IN THIS TWISTED-MINDED OBAMA?

IS THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WILLING TO JUST IGNORE WHAT THEY KNOW AND CHOOSE TO REMAIN AT THE SIDELINES ?

Proof that Obama has no respect for ( non-Muslim) Human Life.

As I outlined in my post, Obama and the Islam Global Domination Part 1, one of Obama's most urgent agenda is to promote abortion and gay marriages in the non-Muslim world. This is in line with the fact that Muslims intend to rule the world by sheer numbers.

Since abortion and gay marriages are not options for Muslims, by promoting these two "rights", Western population will decline even faster, while the Muslim population will be growing geometrically.


After having signed an E.O. to provide taxpayers' money to fund abortion locally as well as in any other country, Obama has taken the next step. He has nominated four people known for their pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, and anti-life stands, for top-level positions in the U.S. Department of Justice.

These nominees, namely : David Ogden, Elena Kagan, Dawn Johnsen, and Thomas Perrelli, hold far-left ideology, as can be seen through their legal careers. Their appointments would seriously jeopardize the proper interpretation and application of the U.S. Constitution.

"All four have each demonstrated, throughout their careers, a flawed understanding of the Constitution," said ADF Senior Counsel Gary McCaleb. “Their legal philosophies depart from mainstream views, their professional careers reflect a far-left ideology, and their involvement in the DOJ could jeopardize the proper enforcement of federal law and the development of constitutional doctrines.”

CONSIDER EACH NOMINEE'S "QUALIFICATIONS"

David Ogden holds an advocacy of sexually oriented businesses and abortion.

Elena Kagan has been openly hostile towards the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. The policy, by the way, is favored by a majority of Americans, including a majority of military servicemen and women.

Dawn Johnsen, was the former legal director for the National Abortion Rights Action League (currently NARAL Pro-Choice America), an organization that has publicly and in no uncertain terms, strongly opposed the federal law banning partial-birth abortions.

Thomas Perrelli was a major opponent to the fight for the sanctity of human life. This can be seen most clearly by his having represented the husband of Terri Schiavo, in alliance with the American Civil Liberties Union to deprive the Florida woman of food and water–and ultimately of her life.

For your and everybody's sake, never forget Terri Schiavo, and what they did to her.

And, for God's sake, do something. Call your representatives and demand from them not to let these pro-killing nominees to pass. They are all violators to our Founding Father's vision to provide everyone the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Fighting many Americans' Indifference

I asked some of my Twitter friends to read my blog posts, and to do something – anything, however small -- in order to help defend American freedom and way of life. There were many positive responses, and I thank them in behalf of the free world. But there were some who replied via Twitter, who said:

1) Well, I am really not into politics.

2) Or, I am too occupied doing the things that I enjoy.

3) Nice analysis, but I don’t see it the way you see it.

4) I don’t take sides. I am happy with the way things are.

My take on this is, such statements are mere reflections of what I have said in my post, The American Dream. A large number of Americans are still too stuck in their comfort zones and addictions to entertainment and pleasure seeking, that they are unable to get out of their indifference to what is being done to our Constitution, our mainstream media, our economy, our democracy, etc.

They are just too immersed in their own individual little worlds. But what they don’t realize is that their comforts, their recreational worlds, their leisure activities, will not be there if Obama succeeds in implementing his secret agenda and plans.

I wanted to continue writing about my Conspiracy theory, where, by connecting the dots about Obama’s Muslim faith, his upbringing, his connections to leftists, and to conscienceless businessmen, we will hopefully be able to shed just enough light on this big puzzle, and get more people to take the necessary actions.

On this note, I am not making any claim that I know exactly what the conspiracy is. All I can do is to present some verified and not-so-verified facts. For by nature, a conspiracy is filled with a lot of complexities and intended divisionary tactics. And with the magnitude of this kind of conspiracy, where a nobody, who comes with a very questionable background and very thin experience, is suddenly catapulted to the highest position in the world, it will take years and a gigantic and ultra expensive effort to peal away the layers and layers of seemingly unrelated information, to finally unravel the truth.

However, America does not have the luxury of time. The issues surrounding the Obama “Presidency” needs to be resolved and resisted fast before Obama is able to consolidate his power bases.

Considering the indifference of still one too many, I have decided to change tactics. I have decided to make my presentations in a much more vivid, albeit indirect, way.

So indifferent, so absorbed in their myopic world, that they don't see what's coming at them.

Part 2 - Obama and the Islam Global domination

Obama and the Islam Global domination

Part 2

Alarmist or just telling you a most unpleasant truth?

Now before anyone of you dismiss this article as alarmist, let's look at what Warner Mackenzie wrote in his article, "It's the Ideology, Stupid!!!" Warner Mackenzie is a resident of Sydney with a long standing interest in Islam and its impact on Western society.

Mackenzie wrote,

"Seemingly unwilling to make the effort to research the true causes of modern Islamist violence, many in the West, including the media, are ever ready to proffer an autoethnophobic (cultural self-loathing) root-cause as to how “We Westerners must have, somehow, caused the problem and therefore deserve what we are getting”. The apologists, propagandists and appeasers continue to confidently promote the view that Islamic terrorism is born of, and nurtured by, poverty, social marginalisation, and Islamophobic bigotry."

"The inescapable historical truth is that influential thinkers such as Hassan al Banna, Sayeed Qutb and Mualana Sayeed Abul Ala Maududi were the modern revivalists of an ideology as old as Islam itself ; an ideology founded on the belief of Islamic superiority with its dream of world domination."

Maududi wrote: “Islam is not a normal religion like the other religions in the world and Muslim nations are not like normal nations. Muslim nations are very special because they have a command from Allah to rule the entire world and to be over every nation in the world.”

The following comments, by other prominent Muslims, are a few examples showing how widely these views are held.

“One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”

---Former Algerian President Houari Boumedienne’s prophetic warning to Europe in a speech at the U.N. In 1974.

“The Quran should be America's highest authority”. “Islam is not in America to be equal to any other religion but to be dominant.”

--- Omar Ahmad, CAIR's (Council on American-Islamic Relations) chairman of the board.

"I would like to see the Islamic flag fly, not only over number 10 Downing Street, but over the whole world,”

--- Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed, (former leader of the extremist Al-Muhajiroun movement in Britain) in an interview with Reuters.

"Jihad and the rifle alone. NO negotiations, NO conferences and NO dialogue."

---Sheikh Abdullah Azzam--- (Osama bin Laden’s late mentor.)

“Allah revealed Islam in order that humanity could be governed according to it. Unbelief is darkness and disorder. So the unbelievers, if they are not suppressed, create disorder. That is why the Muslims are responsible for the implementation of Allah's Law on the planet, that humanity may be governed by it, as opposed to corrupt man-made laws. The Muslims must make all efforts to establish the religion of Allah on the earth”

---Muhammad 'Abdus Salam Faraj, “Jihad: The Absent Obligation”, p43

Still wondering why Obama is hiding his being a Muslim?

Is Obama a masterful Taqiyya tactician?

Warner Mackenzie writes, "The word "Taqiyya" literally means: "Concealing, precaution, guarding.” It is employed in disguising one's beliefs, intentions, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions or strategies.

In practical terms it is manifested as dissimulation, lying, deceiving, vexing and confounding with the intention of deflecting attention, foiling or pre-emptive blocking. It is currently employed in fending off and neutralising any criticism of Islam or Muslims.

Falsehoods told to prevent the denigration of Islam, to protect oneself, or to promote the cause of Islam are sanctioned in the Qur'an and Sunna, including lying under oath in testimony before a court, deceiving by making distorted statements to the media such as the claim that Islam is a “religion of peace”.

A Muslim is even permitted to deny or denounce his faith if, in so doing, he protects or furthers the interests of Islam, so long as he remains faithful to Islam in his heart.


Some notable taqiyya tactics:

a) Role playing as the victim:

When placed under scrutiny or criminal investigation, (even when there is overwhelming, irrefutable evidence of guilt or complicity), the taqiyya-tactician will quickly attempt to counter the allegation by resorting to the claim that it is, in fact, the accused who are the 'the victims'. Victims of Islamophobia, racism, religious discrimination and intolerance. Currently, this is the most commonly encountered form of distraction and 'outwitting'….. Defence by offence.

b) Manipulative ambiguity and Semantics:

Islamic spokesmen will rarely unequivocally condemn a specific act of terrorism and direct questions will be skillfully evaded.

(NB: because Muslims regard Islamic attacks as “jihad”, and not terrorism, their spokesmen can truthfully deny any support for terrorism.)

Interviewers would be better advised to ask the more precise question “do you believe in jihad against the unbelievers?

However, a direct question requiring a simple "YES" or "NO" reply is rarely forthcoming and is usually deflected by responding with a tangentially irrelevant rejoinder or, in an attempt to neutralise the original question, counter-challenging with another question such as “are you in favour of killing children in Iraq?”…..Touché and Checkmate!

c) Diversion, deflection and "tu quoque”:

Questions relating to the 9/11 terrorist attacks will usually be diverted by either making outrageously wild conspiracy claims “the CIA did it to give the U.S. an excuse to attack Muslims,… Mossad was the perpetrator… No Jews came to work at the World Trade Centre on September 11” etc. or by making an irrelevant counter reference to “the plight of the Palestinians”,.. Iraqis,.. colonialism,.. the crusades, or US foreign policy’s support for Israel” as the 'root causes' of terrorism.

d) Demanding 'evidence':

Islamic spokesmen practice a form of taqiyya defined in psychology as 'cognitive denial' by repetitive and persistent demands of 'where is the evidence!' and 'prove it!' whenever there is Muslim complicity in terrorist acts, evidence, which they know very well, for security or legal sub-judice restraints, can not be disclosed. If indeed the “evidence” were to be publicly presented, they would then move on to the familiar “prejudicial to the defendant receiving a fair trial--grounds for a mistrial” default position.

e) The Islamic 'defence' script:

Islamic spokesmen appear to follow a well prepared script as they repeat "Islam is tolerant and peace loving”. In instances where they find themselves presented with, and cornered by, undeniable evidence that murderous radicals are indeed guilty as charged the spokesman will then fall back on the old chestnut that the culprits are only a “small minority” and not “true Muslims” anyway.

There’s a common and oft repeated lie that “Islam” means peace”, it doesn’t, it translates as “submission” (to Allah).

Islamic falsehoods are echoed uncritically by Western politicians and other apologist dupes, for example, "A small group of fundamentalists have hijacked a great and noble religion”. This timely, skilful, misleading and diversionary theme of the 'hijacking' of Islam ... has become an “accepted fact” repeated, ad nauseum, ever since.

The "Islam has been hijacked” myth is now a clichéd media and political reference which serves to deflect attention from the empirical proof of a fourteen hundred year continuity of the doctrinal, political and religious nature of Islamic jihad.

A related theme that “a small minority of Muslims are engaged in terrorism” is utterly irrelevant as terrorism is always perpetrated by 'small minorities' or more accurately small groups or cells. Surveys consistently reveal that between 10-15% of all Muslims sympathise with the aims and methodology of this radical strain of Islam which has been “hijacked”. This means, that within an estimated world population of 1.2 billion Muslims, there are 120-180 million people prepared to fund, facilitate and in general, give moral and financial assistance to the jihadists….. “a small minority”?

f) Taqiyya and the Deceptive definition of Jihad:

After yet another violent incident in Sydney, involving “Males of Middle-Easter Appearance”, a spokesman for the Muslim community appeared on a Sydney television evening newscast. In the brief soundbight he defensively declared “our religion teaches us that we must be kind to one another” ….and indeed it does, it simply depends on how we are to interpret the words “one another”, as these verses from the Quran demonstrate:

Muslims are harsh against the unbelievers (all non-Muslims) , merciful to one another. – (Q 48:25)

Muhammad is Allah's apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.

Through them, Allah seeks to enrage the unbelievers. – (Q48:29)

So, was this spokesman lying?

Or was he telling the truth?

The answer is both, YES,… and NO! – Or, perhaps neither. And if you are confused by this apparent contradiction, you were meant to be, because he was practising taqiyya.


How many times have you read, heard and viewed Obama use these and other deceptive tactics?

The Conspiracy unfolding: Obama, taqiyya tactics, and Muslim global domination

Obama and the Islam Global domination

Part 1

Inspite of Obama's claims that he is a Christian, he is clearly a Muslim by faith and by conviction.

There are numerous evidences that show that Obama is actually a Muslim. The following are just some of such evidences.

In an ABS interview, Obama blundered by saying “My Muslim faith”, and tried to correct himself. But it was too late by then.

After 35 years since he left Indonesia, Obama was able to recite the Shahada, in an interview with The New York Times, "with a first-class [Arabic] accent”. He said that the Muslim call to prayer, the Adhan, is "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth", and it runs through his head often.

He showed absolutely no qualms in mocking the Holy Bible, in one of his speaking engagements in June 2006. In fact he was clearly enjoying himself.

He does not give his children Christmas presents, due to a lame alibi of "setting some limits". Truth is, Muslims do not to celebrate Christmas, for it runs contrary to their faith.

QUESTION: Why is Barack Obama hiding his true religion? Is there anything wrong about being a Muslim, and therefore a follower of Islam?

Obama is doing his best to hide the fact that he is actually a Muslim due to:

1) The fact that, according to a 2008 study by American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS), America is still 70% Christian, and only 0.5% Muslim.

2) Americans are generally wary of Muslims due to the 9/11 and other terrorist attacks.

3) Obama doesn’t want to draw attention to his real and hidden agenda.

What is Obama's secret Muslim agenda?

Have you ever wondered why Obama's first two acts as President had nothing to do with addressing the many urgent problems in America? One of the very first Executive Orders he signed was to grant U.S. government funding for abortions anywhere in the world.

As a Muslim, Obama knows that high Muslim population growth is, in fact, a part of a greater global plan to make Islam the dominant religion in the world by sheer demographics. It is estimated that, at present, there are 1.2 Billion Muslims all over the world.

In India alone, between 1961 and 1991, Muslim population had grown by 133.7% as compared to Hindu growth of 89.24% -- the Muslim population growth being 150% of the Hindu population growth.

Abortion is not an option for Muslims. They even allow men to have many wives. So, while the Western countries are having zero or even negative birth rates and aging populations, the Muslim population is increasing almost geometrically.

For Obama to borrow money to fund abortions worldwide, which is not one of the problems that need urgent attention, and at a time that the U.S. economy is shaky, really shows that there is something more to Obama’s rabid pro-abortion stand than the defense of women’s rights.

Pro Life groups should therefore take cognizance of this, and start deploying different strategies to fight this policy. Like exerting efforts to expose Obama's real agenda as illustrated in this article.

The other thing that Obama has long been supporting is the legalization of gay marriages. Gay couples cannot possibly have biological children. Again, this is part of the grand plan to conquer the world through sheer numbers alone.

The only other Executive Order that he signed as his first act as President was the closure of hidden CIA prisons and the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp in Cuba. The order was essentially intended to eventually transfer all the captured terrorists, held in such facilities, to mainland U.S.A.

Will they be distributed in prison facilities that are strategically located in key areas of the mainland? Looks like a sinister plan is about to be implemented.

One week after his inauguration, President Obama designated $20.3 million to aid the Palestinian refugees in Gaza to immigrate to the U.S.

What security measures are in place to keep the HAMAS terrorists from gaining free access into the U.S.? Is President Obama, in the guise of having "compassion" for the oppressed Palestinians, opening the floodgates and inviting HAMAS terrorists to “migrate” to the U.S.A.?

Click here to read Part 2 of this post

The Conspiracy unfolding: Obama a Usurper in the White House?

The Eligibility Issue

“If Mr. Obama fails to prove his citizenship but the voters, the electors, or the members of the House purport to "elect" him, he will be nothing but a usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such…a usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation… Obama will not constitutionally be the commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States ... therefore, he will be entitled to no obedience whatsoever from anyone in those forces.”
Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr.

The truth about his eligibility until now is still so cloudy, due largely to Obama himself. If he was truly born in Hawaii, then, isn’t it logical that all he needed to do, was to present to the public and to his critics, a $10 worth of paper known as a birth certificate? If he had done that immediately after the issue came out, he would have shamed his political opponents, and he would have gained more credibility.

Instead he opted to spend millions of taxpayers' money to engage in deceptive tactics, pay off his allies, and pay his expensive lawyers to fight the 20 (at that time) lawsuits against him. By doing this, he made many voters doubt his eligibility.

Why did he unnecessarily risk his chances of getting the nomination and then getting elected? Well, since he obviously is not stupid, the only plausible explanation is that he can’t produce an authentic birth certificate showing that Hawaii, not Kenya, was his real birthplace.

Obama’s control over the Media and his show of unprecedented arrogance towards the Supreme Court

One of the most surprising thing about this eligibility issue was the “absence of interest” by media, including the staunchly dependable conservative James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal, Rush Limbaugh, and Hugh Hewitt , to name a few. Or why conservative radio icons Al Rantel and Tammy Bruce have so quickly done an about-face, even reprimanding and threatening their call-in audience never to mention the birth-certificate issue.

Now, why would professional and well-respected radio announcers scream at and threaten their precious and loyal followers for an issue that can be discussed in a more civilized manner?

The most probable explanation came from an anonymous lady who wrote, to Joan Swirsk of The (Philadelphia) Bulletin, the following. "I suspect," she wrote, “that a memo went out en masse to the media from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) not to mention the birth certificate subject under penalty of losing their licenses to broadcast. Now we have practically a national shutdown of the media, and the only entity that would have had the power to bring this about is the FCC. For the entire airwaves, in unison, to suddenly take the position that Mr. Obama's birth certificate is out of bounds means that they've been ordered not to discuss it.”

The lady continued, "Think about it ... every single one of the major radio hosts rebuked callers at the same time - and on the same day in most cases! My guess is that big guns from ACORN and also from the Nation of Islam have gotten to the F.C.C. and have told them in no uncertain terms that if Mr. Obama is blocked from becoming POTUS, there will be hell to pay all over America. And obviously these threats were deemed credible enough by those making the decisions at the FCC that they have succeeded.”

Also, several blogsites, that questioned the eligibility issue, have been tampered with or even made inaccessible to the owners of the blogs, including, for example Dr. Orly Taitz' Blogger blog.

Dr. Taitz is a Russian lady immigrant who has has been working tirelessly to help save America. It is reported that she gets by with only 3 to 4 hours of sleep, and has been spending her personal money to finance her lawsuits.

Barack Obama relied on his powerful leftist allies and black activist supporters to suppress press freedom and control Mainstream Media, or MSM, even until the present. This topic will be discussed in the subsequent posts.

Without any pressure from the media, the 20 cases (at that time) filed by Democrats and Independents did not grab urgent action by the courts.

By the time Donofrio’s case was scheduled, in December, for hearing in the Supreme Court, Obama was already elected as President. The Justices, afraid, in all probability, to face the ire of the millions of Americans, particularly the blacks, who voted for Obama, dismissed the case on December 2008, without any explanation whatsoever.

Also, it is noteworthy to mention that the Philip Berg’s case was dismissed by the Philadelphia federal court for Berg’s “lack of standing” . In the ensuing press conference, Berg asks, "This is a question of who has standing to stand up for our Constitution," Berg said. "If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to ask whether or not the likely next president of the United States--the most powerful man in the entire world--is eligible to be in that office in the first place, then who does?" Remember Philip Berg is a Philadelphia attorney and the former Deputy Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

And when the December 1 deadline, for the Obama legal team to file their response to the Berg Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, arrived, Obama did something unthinkable. He ignored the Supreme Court’s deadline! He effectively showed total disrespect for the highest court of the United States of America.

Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth”

Ron Polarik, who holds a Ph.D. in Instructional Media and specializes in computer graphics, with over 20 years experience with computers, printers and typewriters, has come forth with more definitive evidence than the word processor that tried to simulate a 1970s Selectric typewriter.

Polarik has submitted a signed affidavit and has now released his findings on video at www.ObamaForgery.com with his identity masked and voice altered to guard against the carrying out of threats, which he has already received.

The Summary: The Certificate of Live Birth documents posted on Mr. Obama's website, www.FightTheSmears.com, Daily Kos (a pro-Obama blog) and factcheck.org, (a pro-Obama political research group), were found to be altered and forged.

Obama’s website, FightTheSmears.com shows us this on the front page (scroll down to FactCheck.org):

“Smears claiming Obama doesn’t have a birth certificate aren’t actually about that piece of paper, they’re about manipulating people into thinking Obama is not an American citizen. The truth is Obama was born in the State of Hawaii in 1961 a native citizen of the United States of America".

Notice the word “Native”, not “Natural born”.

And it goes on to state: “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children. ”

Idiots! It can not be any more clear than this. They have unwittingly admitted that Obama is not a natural born citizen.

Obama, an Indonesian?

But beyond the birth certificate issue, there's the matter that Obama traveled to Indonesia to see his mother. This seemed plausible, except for the fact that his mother returned to Hawaii in August of 1980 to file for a divorce from her second husband, Lolo Soetoro. Unless she went back to pal around with the man she divorced, she wasn't there at the time of Obama's visit.

There's another problem. No record of Obama holding an American passport prior to the one he received once becoming a U.S. senator has been found. If he traveled to Pakistan with an American passport, he wouldn't have been allowed in – since Pakistan was in turmoil in 1981 and under martial law. It was also on the State Department's travel ban list for U.S. citizens.

If he couldn't get into Pakistan with a U.S. passport, perhaps he went there with an Indonesian passport. But the only way you can get one of those is if you are an Indonesian citizen.

That's quite possible since under Indonesian law, when a male (Obama’s stepfather, Lolo Soetoro), acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son – in this case Obama – to be an Indonesian state citizen, which was also recorded by Obama's school record.

So, if he didn't go to Indonesia in 1981 to visit mom (who had returned to Hawaii by then), might it have something to do with the fact that Indonesian passports expire every five years and it was time for renewal?

Since Indonesia did not allow for dual citizenship, if Obama had an Indonesian passport in 1981, when he was 20 years old, he effectively lost his U.S. citizenship as provided for by 8 USC §1481(a)(2).

Constitutional Implications

Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr. has described the eligibility issue as “America's gravest constitutional crisis in her history.” Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., has four degrees from Harvard University and is a consummate constitutional authority.

Dr. Vieira said, “If Mr. Obama fails to prove his citizenship but the voters, the electors, or the members of the House purport to "elect" him, he will be nothing but a usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such…a usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation.”

”If Mr. Obama takes the presidential oath, .. he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing. So, even if the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the oath, Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it.”

“Obama's every subsequent act in the usurped Office of President will be a criminal offense ..."

”Obama will not constitutionally be the commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States ... therefore, he will be entitled to no obedience whatsoever from anyone in those forces.”

”Obama will have no conceivable authority to make Treaties, or to nominate, and appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States ...”

”Congress can pass no law while a usurper pretends to occupy the Office of President. Thus, if Mr. Obama deceitfully enters office as a usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as 'president.'”

”If Obama does become a usurper posturing as the president, Congress cannot even impeach him because not being the actual President he cannot be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors ... In that case, some other public officials would have to arrest him - with physical force, if he would not go along quietly - in order to prevent him from continuing his imposture."

”If the Establishment allowed Obama to pretend to be the president and the people acquiesced in that charade, just about everything that was done during his faux tenure in office by anyone connected with the Executive Branch of the general government, and quite a bit done by the Legislative Branch and perhaps the Judicial Branch as well, would be arguably illegitimate and subject to being overturned when a constitutional president was finally installed in office.”

"If he continues to dodge the issue, Obama will be dogged with this question every day of his purported 'presidency.' And inevitably the truth will out...for the issue is too simple, the evidence (or lack of it) too accessible...If Obama knows that he is not a natural- born citizen ... then he also knows that he and his henchmen have perpetrated numerous election-related frauds throughout the country - the latest, still-ongoing one, a colossal swindle targeting the American people as a whole."


Mr. Vieira is not alone in his thinking. Gary Kreep, chief counsel for two California Electors and for Alan Keyes in a lawsuit that challenges Mr. Obama's eligibility, and chief of the United States Justice Foundation, has said that he intends to challenge Mr. Obama continuously on the citizenship issue well past inauguration on "every order, every proposal, every piece of paperwork" that Obama produces.

On February 12, 2009, Gary Kreep and Dr. Orly Taitz have submitted a Writ of Mandate for the Obama Eligibility, at the Superior Court of California, Sacramento County.


Summary: Ten reasons why Obama is not qualified

1. He may not be a native born citizen qualified to serve as President under Article II of the Constitution.

He admits he was born to an American mother and a British subject, suggesting dual citizenship at best. If he was not born on U.S. soil, and his mother was a minor, she was ineligible to convey US citizenship. Under the British Nationality Act of 1948, he was born a British Citizen. His paternal grandmother claims to have attended his birth in Kenya. Kenya memorializes his place of birth.

2. He is a suspected illegal alien for two possible reasons

At age 3, his mother and father divorced. His mother remarried and his step-father enrolled him in school in Indonesia as “Barry Soetoro.”

At age 10, after his mother’s second divorce, he reentered the US by casually and illegally assuming his birth name. Later still, he ran for and won elected office under his birth name without disclosing his legal name or his prior use of alternative names.

3. He took elected office and was admitted to the Illinois Bar under an alias

No record of any legal name change from ‘Barry Soetoro’ to ‘Barack Obama’ has ever been found.

4. He probably lost his citizenship.

An Indonesian citizen at age 6 , having been adopted by a national, he may be in the US illegally. USC §1481(a)(2) provides loss of nationality by native born citizens upon “taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state … after having attained the age of eighteen years,” in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1401(a)(1). Indonesia did not allow for dual citizenship. If Obama got an Indonesian passport in 1981, when he was 20 years old, he effectively renounced any U.S. citizenship he may have had.

5. He is suspected of secretly holding a foreign passport.

When he traveled to Pakistan ‘in college’, Americans were not allowed into that country. If he traveled on an Indonesian passport in 1981 at age 20, he was and remains an Indonesian citizen.

6. He posted an illegitimate birth record to deflect questions and allegations.

The “Certification of Live Birth” shown on FightTheSmears.com is not a birth certificate, but an image of an abstract that was invalidated by alteration. As indicated on that same image, the blacked out certification number invalidates the document. Document analysis shows it to be a suspected forgery.

7. The Certification of Live Birth is a suspected forgery.

The border is one that is used in 2007 COLBs. As a security measure, Hawaii changes their borders every year. This is when the Obama campaign claims the certificate was obtained. However, the seal and signature stamp are from a 2008 COLB. As revealed by a process called edging, the Hawaiian seal and signature stamp on the back of the document are revealed to be from the wrong year. Document experts have analyzed other aspects and find forgery.

8. He refuses to release relevant records.

Since matters available in the public domain raise these issues, the burden rests on Obama/Soetoro to explain. He declines to release college applications, transcripts, his birth record, or addresses of where he has lived.

9. His selective service registration may be falsified.

A FOIA document shows a 2008 sequence number for a supposed 1980 registration, an incorrect date of signature, an obsolete postal stamp and other discrepancies. Did he register at age 18 like everyone else?

10. Not a single cause of action has been won by Obama on the merits.

All pending suits attempting to get Obama/Soetoro to produce simple documents have been dismissed on technical grounds such as the standing of the plaintiff. Therefore, the courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States have never ruled on the merits of his citizenship.

Important Statistics to note:

Out of a total of 206 Million registered voters, only 63% actually voted.

Obama got almost 70 Million

McCain got almost 60 Million

The number of registered voters who didn’t voted therefore is 76 Million.

So if we just take action, and are successful in getting the 76 Million who did not vote, and get a few Obama voters to change their minds, we will have at the very least, 140 Million voters on the side of the truth. That’s almost 70% of the entire voting population.

The people are the power in a free country. The politicians, the media, and even big business, are all servants of the people. If we boycott any one of them, they will collapse.

Remember, we are all in this fight for our freedom together. This is a fight for the preservation of the integrity of our Constitution, which is the basis for our freedom as Americans. Not a single American can just sit on the sides and let the others to do the work for them. History and your children will judge your patriotism, or lack of it, depending on what you will do, now that your country needs you.

So write to your state and federal elected representatives and your governor, and express your concern.

Fax, call or write the authorities:

FBI Chicago Division: (312) 421-6700

U.S. Secret Service: 202-406-8000 or 312-353-5431

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): 1-866-347-2423

Honolulu Special Agent Wayne Wills: 808-532-3746

to be continued on the next post