Part 2 - Obama and the Islam Global domination

Obama and the Islam Global domination

Part 2

Alarmist or just telling you a most unpleasant truth?

Now before anyone of you dismiss this article as alarmist, let's look at what Warner Mackenzie wrote in his article, "It's the Ideology, Stupid!!!" Warner Mackenzie is a resident of Sydney with a long standing interest in Islam and its impact on Western society.

Mackenzie wrote,

"Seemingly unwilling to make the effort to research the true causes of modern Islamist violence, many in the West, including the media, are ever ready to proffer an autoethnophobic (cultural self-loathing) root-cause as to how “We Westerners must have, somehow, caused the problem and therefore deserve what we are getting”. The apologists, propagandists and appeasers continue to confidently promote the view that Islamic terrorism is born of, and nurtured by, poverty, social marginalisation, and Islamophobic bigotry."

"The inescapable historical truth is that influential thinkers such as Hassan al Banna, Sayeed Qutb and Mualana Sayeed Abul Ala Maududi were the modern revivalists of an ideology as old as Islam itself ; an ideology founded on the belief of Islamic superiority with its dream of world domination."

Maududi wrote: “Islam is not a normal religion like the other religions in the world and Muslim nations are not like normal nations. Muslim nations are very special because they have a command from Allah to rule the entire world and to be over every nation in the world.”

The following comments, by other prominent Muslims, are a few examples showing how widely these views are held.

“One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”

---Former Algerian President Houari Boumedienne’s prophetic warning to Europe in a speech at the U.N. In 1974.

“The Quran should be America's highest authority”. “Islam is not in America to be equal to any other religion but to be dominant.”

--- Omar Ahmad, CAIR's (Council on American-Islamic Relations) chairman of the board.

"I would like to see the Islamic flag fly, not only over number 10 Downing Street, but over the whole world,”

--- Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed, (former leader of the extremist Al-Muhajiroun movement in Britain) in an interview with Reuters.

"Jihad and the rifle alone. NO negotiations, NO conferences and NO dialogue."

---Sheikh Abdullah Azzam--- (Osama bin Laden’s late mentor.)

“Allah revealed Islam in order that humanity could be governed according to it. Unbelief is darkness and disorder. So the unbelievers, if they are not suppressed, create disorder. That is why the Muslims are responsible for the implementation of Allah's Law on the planet, that humanity may be governed by it, as opposed to corrupt man-made laws. The Muslims must make all efforts to establish the religion of Allah on the earth”

---Muhammad 'Abdus Salam Faraj, “Jihad: The Absent Obligation”, p43

Still wondering why Obama is hiding his being a Muslim?

Is Obama a masterful Taqiyya tactician?

Warner Mackenzie writes, "The word "Taqiyya" literally means: "Concealing, precaution, guarding.” It is employed in disguising one's beliefs, intentions, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions or strategies.

In practical terms it is manifested as dissimulation, lying, deceiving, vexing and confounding with the intention of deflecting attention, foiling or pre-emptive blocking. It is currently employed in fending off and neutralising any criticism of Islam or Muslims.

Falsehoods told to prevent the denigration of Islam, to protect oneself, or to promote the cause of Islam are sanctioned in the Qur'an and Sunna, including lying under oath in testimony before a court, deceiving by making distorted statements to the media such as the claim that Islam is a “religion of peace”.

A Muslim is even permitted to deny or denounce his faith if, in so doing, he protects or furthers the interests of Islam, so long as he remains faithful to Islam in his heart.


Some notable taqiyya tactics:

a) Role playing as the victim:

When placed under scrutiny or criminal investigation, (even when there is overwhelming, irrefutable evidence of guilt or complicity), the taqiyya-tactician will quickly attempt to counter the allegation by resorting to the claim that it is, in fact, the accused who are the 'the victims'. Victims of Islamophobia, racism, religious discrimination and intolerance. Currently, this is the most commonly encountered form of distraction and 'outwitting'….. Defence by offence.

b) Manipulative ambiguity and Semantics:

Islamic spokesmen will rarely unequivocally condemn a specific act of terrorism and direct questions will be skillfully evaded.

(NB: because Muslims regard Islamic attacks as “jihad”, and not terrorism, their spokesmen can truthfully deny any support for terrorism.)

Interviewers would be better advised to ask the more precise question “do you believe in jihad against the unbelievers?

However, a direct question requiring a simple "YES" or "NO" reply is rarely forthcoming and is usually deflected by responding with a tangentially irrelevant rejoinder or, in an attempt to neutralise the original question, counter-challenging with another question such as “are you in favour of killing children in Iraq?”…..Touché and Checkmate!

c) Diversion, deflection and "tu quoque”:

Questions relating to the 9/11 terrorist attacks will usually be diverted by either making outrageously wild conspiracy claims “the CIA did it to give the U.S. an excuse to attack Muslims,… Mossad was the perpetrator… No Jews came to work at the World Trade Centre on September 11” etc. or by making an irrelevant counter reference to “the plight of the Palestinians”,.. Iraqis,.. colonialism,.. the crusades, or US foreign policy’s support for Israel” as the 'root causes' of terrorism.

d) Demanding 'evidence':

Islamic spokesmen practice a form of taqiyya defined in psychology as 'cognitive denial' by repetitive and persistent demands of 'where is the evidence!' and 'prove it!' whenever there is Muslim complicity in terrorist acts, evidence, which they know very well, for security or legal sub-judice restraints, can not be disclosed. If indeed the “evidence” were to be publicly presented, they would then move on to the familiar “prejudicial to the defendant receiving a fair trial--grounds for a mistrial” default position.

e) The Islamic 'defence' script:

Islamic spokesmen appear to follow a well prepared script as they repeat "Islam is tolerant and peace loving”. In instances where they find themselves presented with, and cornered by, undeniable evidence that murderous radicals are indeed guilty as charged the spokesman will then fall back on the old chestnut that the culprits are only a “small minority” and not “true Muslims” anyway.

There’s a common and oft repeated lie that “Islam” means peace”, it doesn’t, it translates as “submission” (to Allah).

Islamic falsehoods are echoed uncritically by Western politicians and other apologist dupes, for example, "A small group of fundamentalists have hijacked a great and noble religion”. This timely, skilful, misleading and diversionary theme of the 'hijacking' of Islam ... has become an “accepted fact” repeated, ad nauseum, ever since.

The "Islam has been hijacked” myth is now a clichéd media and political reference which serves to deflect attention from the empirical proof of a fourteen hundred year continuity of the doctrinal, political and religious nature of Islamic jihad.

A related theme that “a small minority of Muslims are engaged in terrorism” is utterly irrelevant as terrorism is always perpetrated by 'small minorities' or more accurately small groups or cells. Surveys consistently reveal that between 10-15% of all Muslims sympathise with the aims and methodology of this radical strain of Islam which has been “hijacked”. This means, that within an estimated world population of 1.2 billion Muslims, there are 120-180 million people prepared to fund, facilitate and in general, give moral and financial assistance to the jihadists….. “a small minority”?

f) Taqiyya and the Deceptive definition of Jihad:

After yet another violent incident in Sydney, involving “Males of Middle-Easter Appearance”, a spokesman for the Muslim community appeared on a Sydney television evening newscast. In the brief soundbight he defensively declared “our religion teaches us that we must be kind to one another” ….and indeed it does, it simply depends on how we are to interpret the words “one another”, as these verses from the Quran demonstrate:

Muslims are harsh against the unbelievers (all non-Muslims) , merciful to one another. – (Q 48:25)

Muhammad is Allah's apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.

Through them, Allah seeks to enrage the unbelievers. – (Q48:29)

So, was this spokesman lying?

Or was he telling the truth?

The answer is both, YES,… and NO! – Or, perhaps neither. And if you are confused by this apparent contradiction, you were meant to be, because he was practising taqiyya.


How many times have you read, heard and viewed Obama use these and other deceptive tactics?

The Conspiracy unfolding: Obama, taqiyya tactics, and Muslim global domination

Obama and the Islam Global domination

Part 1

Inspite of Obama's claims that he is a Christian, he is clearly a Muslim by faith and by conviction.

There are numerous evidences that show that Obama is actually a Muslim. The following are just some of such evidences.

In an ABS interview, Obama blundered by saying “My Muslim faith”, and tried to correct himself. But it was too late by then.

After 35 years since he left Indonesia, Obama was able to recite the Shahada, in an interview with The New York Times, "with a first-class [Arabic] accent”. He said that the Muslim call to prayer, the Adhan, is "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth", and it runs through his head often.

He showed absolutely no qualms in mocking the Holy Bible, in one of his speaking engagements in June 2006. In fact he was clearly enjoying himself.

He does not give his children Christmas presents, due to a lame alibi of "setting some limits". Truth is, Muslims do not to celebrate Christmas, for it runs contrary to their faith.

QUESTION: Why is Barack Obama hiding his true religion? Is there anything wrong about being a Muslim, and therefore a follower of Islam?

Obama is doing his best to hide the fact that he is actually a Muslim due to:

1) The fact that, according to a 2008 study by American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS), America is still 70% Christian, and only 0.5% Muslim.

2) Americans are generally wary of Muslims due to the 9/11 and other terrorist attacks.

3) Obama doesn’t want to draw attention to his real and hidden agenda.

What is Obama's secret Muslim agenda?

Have you ever wondered why Obama's first two acts as President had nothing to do with addressing the many urgent problems in America? One of the very first Executive Orders he signed was to grant U.S. government funding for abortions anywhere in the world.

As a Muslim, Obama knows that high Muslim population growth is, in fact, a part of a greater global plan to make Islam the dominant religion in the world by sheer demographics. It is estimated that, at present, there are 1.2 Billion Muslims all over the world.

In India alone, between 1961 and 1991, Muslim population had grown by 133.7% as compared to Hindu growth of 89.24% -- the Muslim population growth being 150% of the Hindu population growth.

Abortion is not an option for Muslims. They even allow men to have many wives. So, while the Western countries are having zero or even negative birth rates and aging populations, the Muslim population is increasing almost geometrically.

For Obama to borrow money to fund abortions worldwide, which is not one of the problems that need urgent attention, and at a time that the U.S. economy is shaky, really shows that there is something more to Obama’s rabid pro-abortion stand than the defense of women’s rights.

Pro Life groups should therefore take cognizance of this, and start deploying different strategies to fight this policy. Like exerting efforts to expose Obama's real agenda as illustrated in this article.

The other thing that Obama has long been supporting is the legalization of gay marriages. Gay couples cannot possibly have biological children. Again, this is part of the grand plan to conquer the world through sheer numbers alone.

The only other Executive Order that he signed as his first act as President was the closure of hidden CIA prisons and the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp in Cuba. The order was essentially intended to eventually transfer all the captured terrorists, held in such facilities, to mainland U.S.A.

Will they be distributed in prison facilities that are strategically located in key areas of the mainland? Looks like a sinister plan is about to be implemented.

One week after his inauguration, President Obama designated $20.3 million to aid the Palestinian refugees in Gaza to immigrate to the U.S.

What security measures are in place to keep the HAMAS terrorists from gaining free access into the U.S.? Is President Obama, in the guise of having "compassion" for the oppressed Palestinians, opening the floodgates and inviting HAMAS terrorists to “migrate” to the U.S.A.?

Click here to read Part 2 of this post