Dictatorship: Obama's Attempt

The American Family Association has issued this following alert.

"According to several news agencies, President Barack Obama will rescind the "conscience rule" that protects health workers who refuse to participate in abortions or other medical procedures that go against their moral and religious beliefs. If the rule is rescinded, doctors, nurses and other health care workers could lose their jobs or be punished professionally for adhering to their sincerely held religious convictions. Obama's proposal would take away their religious freedom.

The current rule empowers federal health officials to cut off federal funding for any state or local government, hospital, clinic, health plan, doctor's office or other entity if it does not accommodate employees who exercise their right of conscience. It applies to more than 584,000 health care facilities.

The Obama administration is doing the bidding of pro-abortion advocacy groups who seek to penalize health care providers who refuse to participate in abortions.

According to The Washington Post, Obama administration officials stressed that the proposal will be subject to 30 days of public comment. That is why it is so very important for you to let the White House hear from you today."

To let the White House know your comments go to http://capwiz.com/afanet/issues/alert/?alertid=12821731&type=PR

N.B. I have informed you in my previous post that all my EDITING TOOLS have been gone for several weeks already. SO WHILE I AM HOPEFULLY WAITING FOR BLOGGER.COM TO FIX THE PROBLEM, PLEASE BEAR WITH THE INCONVENIENCE. THANK YOU.

Anyway, isn't Obama clearly testing the waters here? Does he want to know how the public will react to this attempt at becoming a DICTATOR? This "seeming experiment", if we are to believe what the Administration officials said in the above alert, is clearly an attempt to take away the RIGHT TO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.

What other rights, enshrined in our Constitution, does Obama want to take away next?

Remember how Obama has already taken away Press Freedom from the Main Stream Media, or MSM, by bullying tactics (http://truthhabits.blogspot.com/2009/02/conspiracy-unfolding-putting-obama.html ) and by bribing members of MSM (http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=424112

) with juicy government positions?

That is why the MSM has, from the start until the present, remained silent over the most urgent and important Constitutional issue of Obama's eligibility to run for and to sit as President.

Remember to do all or any of the following actions:

1) Sign the Petition for the Release of Obama's Certificate at this website.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81550

2) Write to your representatives and pressure them to oppose this dictatorial attempt, and to have the MOST CONSTITUTIONALLY URGENT AND IMPORTANT Obama-eligibility issue resolved.

3) Tell all your personal and Online Social Networking friends to do the above too.

4) Boycott NBC (too shamelessly pro-Obama), Hewlett-Packard (extremely pro-abortion), Ford (abortion funder), Pepsi and all Pepsico's many food products (pro-gay marriage), and many more that I will list in later posts.

AMERICA NEEDS YOU MORE THAN EVER BEFORE IN ITS HISTORY. IT IS BEING ATTACKED FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.

Part 2 - Obama and the Islam Global domination

Obama and the Islam Global domination

Part 2

Alarmist or just telling you a most unpleasant truth?

Now before anyone of you dismiss this article as alarmist, let's look at what Warner Mackenzie wrote in his article, "It's the Ideology, Stupid!!!" Warner Mackenzie is a resident of Sydney with a long standing interest in Islam and its impact on Western society.

Mackenzie wrote,

"Seemingly unwilling to make the effort to research the true causes of modern Islamist violence, many in the West, including the media, are ever ready to proffer an autoethnophobic (cultural self-loathing) root-cause as to how “We Westerners must have, somehow, caused the problem and therefore deserve what we are getting”. The apologists, propagandists and appeasers continue to confidently promote the view that Islamic terrorism is born of, and nurtured by, poverty, social marginalisation, and Islamophobic bigotry."

"The inescapable historical truth is that influential thinkers such as Hassan al Banna, Sayeed Qutb and Mualana Sayeed Abul Ala Maududi were the modern revivalists of an ideology as old as Islam itself ; an ideology founded on the belief of Islamic superiority with its dream of world domination."

Maududi wrote: “Islam is not a normal religion like the other religions in the world and Muslim nations are not like normal nations. Muslim nations are very special because they have a command from Allah to rule the entire world and to be over every nation in the world.”

The following comments, by other prominent Muslims, are a few examples showing how widely these views are held.

“One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”

---Former Algerian President Houari Boumedienne’s prophetic warning to Europe in a speech at the U.N. In 1974.

“The Quran should be America's highest authority”. “Islam is not in America to be equal to any other religion but to be dominant.”

--- Omar Ahmad, CAIR's (Council on American-Islamic Relations) chairman of the board.

"I would like to see the Islamic flag fly, not only over number 10 Downing Street, but over the whole world,”

--- Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed, (former leader of the extremist Al-Muhajiroun movement in Britain) in an interview with Reuters.

"Jihad and the rifle alone. NO negotiations, NO conferences and NO dialogue."

---Sheikh Abdullah Azzam--- (Osama bin Laden’s late mentor.)

“Allah revealed Islam in order that humanity could be governed according to it. Unbelief is darkness and disorder. So the unbelievers, if they are not suppressed, create disorder. That is why the Muslims are responsible for the implementation of Allah's Law on the planet, that humanity may be governed by it, as opposed to corrupt man-made laws. The Muslims must make all efforts to establish the religion of Allah on the earth”

---Muhammad 'Abdus Salam Faraj, “Jihad: The Absent Obligation”, p43

Still wondering why Obama is hiding his being a Muslim?

Is Obama a masterful Taqiyya tactician?

Warner Mackenzie writes, "The word "Taqiyya" literally means: "Concealing, precaution, guarding.” It is employed in disguising one's beliefs, intentions, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions or strategies.

In practical terms it is manifested as dissimulation, lying, deceiving, vexing and confounding with the intention of deflecting attention, foiling or pre-emptive blocking. It is currently employed in fending off and neutralising any criticism of Islam or Muslims.

Falsehoods told to prevent the denigration of Islam, to protect oneself, or to promote the cause of Islam are sanctioned in the Qur'an and Sunna, including lying under oath in testimony before a court, deceiving by making distorted statements to the media such as the claim that Islam is a “religion of peace”.

A Muslim is even permitted to deny or denounce his faith if, in so doing, he protects or furthers the interests of Islam, so long as he remains faithful to Islam in his heart.


Some notable taqiyya tactics:

a) Role playing as the victim:

When placed under scrutiny or criminal investigation, (even when there is overwhelming, irrefutable evidence of guilt or complicity), the taqiyya-tactician will quickly attempt to counter the allegation by resorting to the claim that it is, in fact, the accused who are the 'the victims'. Victims of Islamophobia, racism, religious discrimination and intolerance. Currently, this is the most commonly encountered form of distraction and 'outwitting'….. Defence by offence.

b) Manipulative ambiguity and Semantics:

Islamic spokesmen will rarely unequivocally condemn a specific act of terrorism and direct questions will be skillfully evaded.

(NB: because Muslims regard Islamic attacks as “jihad”, and not terrorism, their spokesmen can truthfully deny any support for terrorism.)

Interviewers would be better advised to ask the more precise question “do you believe in jihad against the unbelievers?

However, a direct question requiring a simple "YES" or "NO" reply is rarely forthcoming and is usually deflected by responding with a tangentially irrelevant rejoinder or, in an attempt to neutralise the original question, counter-challenging with another question such as “are you in favour of killing children in Iraq?”…..Touché and Checkmate!

c) Diversion, deflection and "tu quoque”:

Questions relating to the 9/11 terrorist attacks will usually be diverted by either making outrageously wild conspiracy claims “the CIA did it to give the U.S. an excuse to attack Muslims,… Mossad was the perpetrator… No Jews came to work at the World Trade Centre on September 11” etc. or by making an irrelevant counter reference to “the plight of the Palestinians”,.. Iraqis,.. colonialism,.. the crusades, or US foreign policy’s support for Israel” as the 'root causes' of terrorism.

d) Demanding 'evidence':

Islamic spokesmen practice a form of taqiyya defined in psychology as 'cognitive denial' by repetitive and persistent demands of 'where is the evidence!' and 'prove it!' whenever there is Muslim complicity in terrorist acts, evidence, which they know very well, for security or legal sub-judice restraints, can not be disclosed. If indeed the “evidence” were to be publicly presented, they would then move on to the familiar “prejudicial to the defendant receiving a fair trial--grounds for a mistrial” default position.

e) The Islamic 'defence' script:

Islamic spokesmen appear to follow a well prepared script as they repeat "Islam is tolerant and peace loving”. In instances where they find themselves presented with, and cornered by, undeniable evidence that murderous radicals are indeed guilty as charged the spokesman will then fall back on the old chestnut that the culprits are only a “small minority” and not “true Muslims” anyway.

There’s a common and oft repeated lie that “Islam” means peace”, it doesn’t, it translates as “submission” (to Allah).

Islamic falsehoods are echoed uncritically by Western politicians and other apologist dupes, for example, "A small group of fundamentalists have hijacked a great and noble religion”. This timely, skilful, misleading and diversionary theme of the 'hijacking' of Islam ... has become an “accepted fact” repeated, ad nauseum, ever since.

The "Islam has been hijacked” myth is now a clichéd media and political reference which serves to deflect attention from the empirical proof of a fourteen hundred year continuity of the doctrinal, political and religious nature of Islamic jihad.

A related theme that “a small minority of Muslims are engaged in terrorism” is utterly irrelevant as terrorism is always perpetrated by 'small minorities' or more accurately small groups or cells. Surveys consistently reveal that between 10-15% of all Muslims sympathise with the aims and methodology of this radical strain of Islam which has been “hijacked”. This means, that within an estimated world population of 1.2 billion Muslims, there are 120-180 million people prepared to fund, facilitate and in general, give moral and financial assistance to the jihadists….. “a small minority”?

f) Taqiyya and the Deceptive definition of Jihad:

After yet another violent incident in Sydney, involving “Males of Middle-Easter Appearance”, a spokesman for the Muslim community appeared on a Sydney television evening newscast. In the brief soundbight he defensively declared “our religion teaches us that we must be kind to one another” ….and indeed it does, it simply depends on how we are to interpret the words “one another”, as these verses from the Quran demonstrate:

Muslims are harsh against the unbelievers (all non-Muslims) , merciful to one another. – (Q 48:25)

Muhammad is Allah's apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.

Through them, Allah seeks to enrage the unbelievers. – (Q48:29)

So, was this spokesman lying?

Or was he telling the truth?

The answer is both, YES,… and NO! – Or, perhaps neither. And if you are confused by this apparent contradiction, you were meant to be, because he was practising taqiyya.


How many times have you read, heard and viewed Obama use these and other deceptive tactics?

The Conspiracy unfolding: Obama, taqiyya tactics, and Muslim global domination

Obama and the Islam Global domination

Part 1

Inspite of Obama's claims that he is a Christian, he is clearly a Muslim by faith and by conviction.

There are numerous evidences that show that Obama is actually a Muslim. The following are just some of such evidences.

In an ABS interview, Obama blundered by saying “My Muslim faith”, and tried to correct himself. But it was too late by then.

After 35 years since he left Indonesia, Obama was able to recite the Shahada, in an interview with The New York Times, "with a first-class [Arabic] accent”. He said that the Muslim call to prayer, the Adhan, is "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth", and it runs through his head often.

He showed absolutely no qualms in mocking the Holy Bible, in one of his speaking engagements in June 2006. In fact he was clearly enjoying himself.

He does not give his children Christmas presents, due to a lame alibi of "setting some limits". Truth is, Muslims do not to celebrate Christmas, for it runs contrary to their faith.

QUESTION: Why is Barack Obama hiding his true religion? Is there anything wrong about being a Muslim, and therefore a follower of Islam?

Obama is doing his best to hide the fact that he is actually a Muslim due to:

1) The fact that, according to a 2008 study by American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS), America is still 70% Christian, and only 0.5% Muslim.

2) Americans are generally wary of Muslims due to the 9/11 and other terrorist attacks.

3) Obama doesn’t want to draw attention to his real and hidden agenda.

What is Obama's secret Muslim agenda?

Have you ever wondered why Obama's first two acts as President had nothing to do with addressing the many urgent problems in America? One of the very first Executive Orders he signed was to grant U.S. government funding for abortions anywhere in the world.

As a Muslim, Obama knows that high Muslim population growth is, in fact, a part of a greater global plan to make Islam the dominant religion in the world by sheer demographics. It is estimated that, at present, there are 1.2 Billion Muslims all over the world.

In India alone, between 1961 and 1991, Muslim population had grown by 133.7% as compared to Hindu growth of 89.24% -- the Muslim population growth being 150% of the Hindu population growth.

Abortion is not an option for Muslims. They even allow men to have many wives. So, while the Western countries are having zero or even negative birth rates and aging populations, the Muslim population is increasing almost geometrically.

For Obama to borrow money to fund abortions worldwide, which is not one of the problems that need urgent attention, and at a time that the U.S. economy is shaky, really shows that there is something more to Obama’s rabid pro-abortion stand than the defense of women’s rights.

Pro Life groups should therefore take cognizance of this, and start deploying different strategies to fight this policy. Like exerting efforts to expose Obama's real agenda as illustrated in this article.

The other thing that Obama has long been supporting is the legalization of gay marriages. Gay couples cannot possibly have biological children. Again, this is part of the grand plan to conquer the world through sheer numbers alone.

The only other Executive Order that he signed as his first act as President was the closure of hidden CIA prisons and the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp in Cuba. The order was essentially intended to eventually transfer all the captured terrorists, held in such facilities, to mainland U.S.A.

Will they be distributed in prison facilities that are strategically located in key areas of the mainland? Looks like a sinister plan is about to be implemented.

One week after his inauguration, President Obama designated $20.3 million to aid the Palestinian refugees in Gaza to immigrate to the U.S.

What security measures are in place to keep the HAMAS terrorists from gaining free access into the U.S.? Is President Obama, in the guise of having "compassion" for the oppressed Palestinians, opening the floodgates and inviting HAMAS terrorists to “migrate” to the U.S.A.?

Click here to read Part 2 of this post

Why is Barack Obama a very dangerous man?

A man who does something wrong, but does not know that it's wrong, is still a dangerous man. But infinitely more dangerous is the man who knows fully what is right, and yet still chooses to do what is wrong.

So why is Barack Obama a very dangerous man?


1) He does not have any second thoughts about deliberately deceiving people.

In and interview with Newsweek, on his election campaign plane, Obama said, " Arriving at the foot of the cross" .... he "felt God's spirit beckoning me". "I submitted myself to His will, and dedicated myself to discovering His truth."

If he has dedicated himself to truth, why did the Obama campaign and its allies have adopt an extensive "messaging strategy" that seeked to persuade religiously committed Americans that Obama has a middle-of- the-road position on abortion policy, and will promote "abortion reduction." The "messaging strategy" was intended to deflect attention away from Obama's 100% pro-abortion voting record, and from his extensive commitments to pro-abortion interest groups.

Did he really believe that American voters were that naive and ignorant about what he really stood for? What a shamelessly deceptive way to try to get votes. So much for Obama's claim to his total adherence to truth.


2) Obama says something, and does exactly the opposite of what he said, if it is to his advantage.

a) Obama claims that one of his Biblical guidelines when making important decisions is Matthew 25: "Whatever you do unto the least of My brethren, you do unto Me." He claims to also abide by the Golden Rule: "Do not do unto others what you don't want others to do unto you."

b) In the same pre-election campaign interview, Obama says, "It's hard for me to imagine being true to my faith—and not thinking beyond myself, and not thinking about what's good for other people, and not acting in a moral and ethical way,".

If Obama really lives according to the above guidelines, why is he so pro-abortion? Abortion is intrinsically immoral. It is not good for the babies being aborted (to say the least). Nor is it good for the mothers who have abortions. There are literally millions of testimonies, in the Internet, of women who have suffered emotionally, psychologically, and even physically, for years after they had their babies aborted. Nightmares, low self-esteem, suicidal tendencies, inability to bear children, and even breast cancer are some of the after effects of getting an abortion. Many recounted damaged relationships with spouses, parents, and even their children. Too many felt alone, ashamed, and unable to forgive themselves.


One might argue that Obama is not fully convinced that the fetus in the womb is already a human being.

Well, Obama claims that after having become a Christian, for almost 20 years now, he tries to find time to reading his Bible in the evenings. He must have, by now, read Chapter 1 of Luke , where it is implied that the Son of God, became a human being at Mary's "Yes". That's why a few days after, Elizabeth, inspired by the Holy Spirit, addressed Mary as Mother of our Lord. How can Mary, or any other pregnant woman, be called "mother", if they don't have a human being in their womb?

If the Divinely inspired Holy Scriptures is not good enough proof for him, he can always read the thousands of scientific testimonies of renowned doctors and scientists who unanimously agree that human life begins at conception. Or he can view any of the videos of 8-week old babies in the womb, fending off the invasive abortion instruments that are killing them. These are all readily available in the Internet. Even pro-abortionists concede that 8-week old fetuses (babies) can already feel pain.

But I am convinced Obama has already looked all of these materials. For if he has not done any research on an issue that is so important, then that makes him a fool, and a dangerous fool at that. If he has the habit of taking stands on issues without studying them first, then he will be a dangerous President to have.

If all evidences, from the Holy Bible, and from the scientific and medical communities, point to the fact that the human life really begins at conception, why is Obama still pro-abortion? My educated guess is, pro-abortion proponents give huge amounts in campaign donations, while anti-abortion proponents rely on moral persuasion and refrain from giving bribe money. So Obama silenced his conscience and went where the big money is.

c) If he truly lives by his faith's teachings on the need to do good for others, acting in a moral and ethical way, and abides by the Golden Rule, why has he, as a Senator, co-sponsored FOCA? And why was he so clear in his declaring that one of the first things he would do as President, is to sign FOCA or the Freedom of Choice Act? FOCA is a bill in Congress which, if enacted, would abolish all existing laws, whether at the State or Federal level, that restrict and limit the “right” of American women to have an abortion. FOCA is intended to do the following:

• Render useless all existing bans on partial birth abortions (where the baby is removed all the way to the head, and the head is stabbed and the brain sucked out). Sorry if that was too offensive for you.

• Remove the requirements that women be informed about the personal risks they are taking in getting an abortion.

• Disallow the giving of information regarding possible alternatives to abortion.

• Remove the rights of the parents to be informed about and give consent or disapproval to a minor daughter’s abortion.

• Abolish the law which prohibits government funding for abortion on demand. In other words, Obama will be using baby-loving taxpayers' money to fund his baby-killing agenda.

For me, FOCA is the one bill that has finally shown that “Pro-choice” is really just a grandiose euphemism. It shows that the "pro-choice" proponents are not really interested in giving the women a choice. With the above mentioned FOCA provisions, how can a woman, contemplating an abortion, possibly make an intelligent and well informed choice?

The bill shows very clearly that the abortion proponents urgently want the contemplated abortion to proceed without any kind of hindrance, whatsoever.

While he repeatedly branded McCain as a war monger, Obama is bent on declaring a total, no-holds-barred war on the most innocent and most defenseless of all human beings, the unborn child. Since 1973, the year of the infamous SC decision on Roe vs. Wade, the National Right to Life Committee and Human Life International has placed the total performed abortions at over 1.44 Billion, as of this writing! That is more than the total of all the people killed in all the wars mankind has ever known. And Obama and company are intending to increase it by even a faster rate.

It is so illogical for Obama to promise to continue to fight and put and end to terrorism, for it harms and even kills innocent civilians, while deciding to become the leader of the worst kind of terrorism, which has the most innocent and defenseless babies as the primary target.

3) Obama is all about selfish personal gain.

In the same Newsweek interview, Obama described his long and arduous journey to find God.

He claimed to have lived an ascetic existence, did a lot of fasting, did a lot of spiritual exploration, and withdrew from the world in a fairly deliberate way. He read a lot of books by notable authors of different beliefs. He was exposed to all of the major religions, physically (that is, he attended their worship services) and mentally (through readings of other very notable writers, and having spiritual mentors and directors).

Finally, after more than 10 years of searching, he discovered Jesus Christ and became Christian in the early 1990's. That was almost 20 years ago. So, while speaking "often and eloquently about the importance of religion in public life," why did he deliberately refrain from revealing his religion during the campaign?

Obama was obviously more worried about offending potential campaign supporters, than offending God who has made the Love of God as His greatest commandment. How can you now trust a guy who will put the love of political success above anything else? Doesn't he sound like just another run-of-the mill politician to you? And to think that his main campaign slogan and promise was "Change". HA!

I’m a big fan of G.K.Chesterton. And it’s not hard to admire his best friend, Hilaire Belloc, who decided to run for the British Parliament in the early 1900’s. Inspite of the fact that Britain was a predominantly Anglican nation, Belloc declared, “Gentlemen, I am a Catholic. As far as possible, I go to Mass every day. This is a rosary. As far as possible, I kneel down and pray these beads every day. If you reject me on account of my religion, I shall thank God that he has spared me the indignity of being your representative.” Now, that’s what I call a real man!


4) As early as now, Obama has shown that his promise, and therefore, mandate of bringing meaningful "Change" to government, was just a mere slogan to get himself elected as President.

Allow me to quote Mary Anne Berkery of Brooklyn, in her letter to the New York Times' editors, dated Nov. 23.

"The reason why most Americans supported an unknown, untested, thinly experienced Barack Obama as president was that they were desperate for real change. His unequivocal mandate was to bring real change. Instead we watch as he appoints person after person from the Clinton political machine, creating a virtual third Clinton presidency -- the very re-creations many of us had worked hard to prevent."

"Instead of taking the mantle of Franklin D. Roosevelt, he has taken the mantle of Bill Clinton. It's more than disappointing. It's dishonest."

Couldn't have said it better.


Now that we have seen how Obama

• will deliberately resort to grossly deceptive tactics just to get what he wants,

• how he will publicly say things that he has no intention of doing,

• how quickly he will use his eloquence to portray himself as a principled man, even if he is not,

• how unashamedly he will hide and even forego his faith for political expediency,

• how he will use slogans that appeal to people, without any intention to live up to them,

• how he easily he can disregard his conscience and do what he knows in his heart, is immoral and wrong,

• how easily he will dismiss overwhelming Biblical and scientific evidences, and stubbornly stick to what side will benefit him the most,

• and how he has shown that he has absolutely no regard for human life, in the case of the abortion issue, and will even render the safeguards useless,

Don't you think that we are looking at an incoming President of the world's most powerful country, who is absolutely untrustworthy, unprincipled, a hypocrite of the highest caliber, and without a conscience? With such negative characteristics, while holding the most powerful position, don't you think Obama is indeed a very dangerous man?